These aren’t the most shocking of discovery request results of all time, but they’re not your average discovery request either. A law case is never short of high profile drama. There are facts, information, witnesses and lawyers all trying to prove a point and make sure their client is innocent. In the business world most of all, witnesses and parties can go to bizarre lengths to hide the truth and turn the tide of the case in your favor. As the best California business law firm’s lawyers would tell you. If a lawyer does not think that the facts of a case are being told as they are, they can demand a discovery process.
In this process, the lawyer is allowed to dig deeper into the defendants details to get hold of any information i.e. past convictions, frauds or other discoveries that the person may be hiding. This article takes a look at some of the most shocking things that were found in discovery in law cases.
· Bad Blood
This was one of the most baffling cases of discovery. Dr. John Schneeberger was a respected doctor. He was accused of assaulting Candace a 23 year old patient whom he had drugged before the assault. After Candace reported the doctor, the court ordered blood samples to be taken for DNA evidence. The two blood samples drawn from the doctor’s arms came back negative and were not a match. The police and the victim were left baffled.
The victim then made a private investigator get a saliva sample from the doctor and it was positive but that was inadmissible. Later Dr. Schneeburger was accused of the same horrors by the victim’s 13 year old daughter. This time the police used blood from his finger tips and it was a match. The doctor later accepted that he had been injecting blood of his patients in him to dupe the discovery process.
· Too Secretive to Go On
Lawyers who work for the best California business law firm will know that it would be wrong for the government to step in and end a case because it was too secretive. That is what happened in the case of Victor Restis against United against Nuclear Iran group. The Greek magnate had filed the case of defamation against the group for damaging the reputation of his company. As the discovery process had been requested to find more about the group United against Nuclear Iran, the US government appeared in court, had secret discussions with the judge and went on to dismiss the lawsuit disregarding all parties.
· Vulnerability Disclosure not allowed
In a bizarre and interesting case, Fire Eye and ERNW are against one another over the latter security firm’s inquest into the vulnerabilities of the former firm’s security. In the disclosure stage of the case it was revealed that the two security firms were uncovering vulnerabilities against the other. The interesting discovery was that Fire Eye a security firm got an injunction from the court against the actions of ERNW from including information about the Fire Eye systems vulnerability for fear of it being compromised (as if its security already doesn’t have flaws).
These are only some of the cases that have interesting discoveries that can shock and awe even the best lawyers in the best California business law firm.